MemSQL、SQLFire、Oracle XE性能对比测试

苏承栈

2026-08-22 • 👁 0人浏览过

1.软件版本 MemSQL 3.1 Pivotal SQLFire 1.1.2 Oracle 11g XE 2.测试环境宿主机 OS：Windows 7 64位专业版 CPU：i7-3770 3.4GHz 内存：16G 硬盘：大于800G VMware虚拟机 OS：CentOS 6.3 64位内存：16G 其中MemSQL运行于虚拟机，SQLFire和Oracle直接运行于宿主机 SQLFire只开启一个server member 3.DDL MemSQL

DROP TABLE t_main;

DROP TABLE t_rel1;
DROP TABLE t_rel2;
DROP TABLE t_rel3;


create table t_main(
rec_id BIGINT not null  PRIMARY KEY,
c1 DOUBLE PRECISION,
c2 BIGINT,
c3 VARCHAR(100),
c4 VARCHAR(100),
c5 VARCHAR(100),
c6 VARCHAR(100)


) ;


create table t_rel1(
rec_id BIGINT not null  PRIMARY KEY,
main_id BIGINT,
c1 DOUBLE PRECISION,
c2 BIGINT,
c3 VARCHAR(100),
c4 VARCHAR(100),
c5 VARCHAR(100),
c6 VARCHAR(100)


) ;


create table t_rel2(
rec_id BIGINT not null  PRIMARY KEY,
main_id BIGINT,
c1 DOUBLE PRECISION,
c2 BIGINT,
c3 VARCHAR(100),
c4 VARCHAR(100),
c5 VARCHAR(100),
c6 VARCHAR(100)


) ;


create table t_rel3(
rec_id BIGINT not null  PRIMARY KEY,
main_id BIGINT,
c1 DOUBLE PRECISION,
c2 BIGINT,
c3 VARCHAR(100),
c4 VARCHAR(100),
c5 VARCHAR(100),
c6 VARCHAR(100)


) ;


create index rel1main on t_rel1(main_id);
create index rel2main on t_rel2(main_id);
create index rel3main on t_rel3(main_id);

SQLFire

DROP TABLE t_main;

DROP TABLE t_rel1;
DROP TABLE t_rel2;
DROP TABLE t_rel3;


create table t_main(
rec_id BIGINT not null  PRIMARY KEY,
c1 DOUBLE PRECISION,
c2 BIGINT,
c3 VARCHAR(100),
c4 VARCHAR(100),
c5 VARCHAR(100),
c6 VARCHAR(100)


) PERSISTENT;


create table t_rel1(
rec_id BIGINT not null  PRIMARY KEY,
main_id BIGINT,
c1 DOUBLE PRECISION,
c2 BIGINT,
c3 VARCHAR(100),
c4 VARCHAR(100),
c5 VARCHAR(100),
c6 VARCHAR(100)


) PERSISTENT;


create table t_rel2(
rec_id BIGINT not null  PRIMARY KEY,
main_id BIGINT,
c1 DOUBLE PRECISION,
c2 BIGINT,
c3 VARCHAR(100),
c4 VARCHAR(100),
c5 VARCHAR(100),
c6 VARCHAR(100)


) PERSISTENT;


create table t_rel3(
rec_id BIGINT not null  PRIMARY KEY,
main_id BIGINT,
c1 DOUBLE PRECISION,
c2 BIGINT,
c3 VARCHAR(100),
c4 VARCHAR(100),
c5 VARCHAR(100),
c6 VARCHAR(100)


) PERSISTENT;


create index rel1main on t_rel1(main_id);
create index rel2main on t_rel2(main_id);
create index rel3main on t_rel3(main_id);

Oracle

DROP TABLE t_main;

DROP TABLE t_rel1;
DROP TABLE t_rel2;
DROP TABLE t_rel3;


create table t_main(
rec_id NUMBER(19,0) not null  PRIMARY KEY,
c1 DOUBLE PRECISION,
c2 NUMBER(19,0),
c3 VARCHAR2(100),
c4 VARCHAR2(100),
c5 VARCHAR2(100),
c6 VARCHAR2(100)


) ;


create table t_rel1(
rec_id NUMBER(19,0) not null  PRIMARY KEY,
main_id NUMBER(19,0),
c1 DOUBLE PRECISION,
c2 NUMBER(19,0),
c3 VARCHAR2(100),
c4 VARCHAR2(100),
c5 VARCHAR2(100),
c6 VARCHAR2(100)


) ;


create table t_rel2(
rec_id NUMBER(19,0) not null  PRIMARY KEY,
main_id NUMBER(19,0),
c1 DOUBLE PRECISION,
c2 NUMBER(19,0),
c3 VARCHAR2(100),
c4 VARCHAR2(100),
c5 VARCHAR2(100),
c6 VARCHAR2(100)


) ;


create table t_rel3(
rec_id NUMBER(19,0) not null  PRIMARY KEY,
main_id NUMBER(19,0),
c1 DOUBLE PRECISION,
c2 NUMBER(19,0),
c3 VARCHAR2(100),
c4 VARCHAR2(100),
c5 VARCHAR2(100),
c6 VARCHAR2(100)


) ;


create index rel1main on t_rel1(main_id);
create index rel2main on t_rel2(main_id);
create index rel3main on t_rel3(main_id);

4.测试数据 4张表，每张100万条数据生成数据的代码片段为

String sql = "insert into t_main(rec_id,c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6) values(?,?,?,?,?,?,?)";

PreparedStatement st1 = conn.prepareStatement(sql);
sql = "insert into t_rel1(rec_id,main_id,c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6) values(?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?)";
PreparedStatement st2 = conn.prepareStatement(sql);
sql = "insert into t_rel2(rec_id,main_id,c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6) values(?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?)";
PreparedStatement st3 = conn.prepareStatement(sql);
sql = "insert into t_rel3(rec_id,main_id,c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6) values(?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?)";
PreparedStatement st4 = conn.prepareStatement(sql);


long a = System.currentTimeMillis();


for (int i = 1; i <= count; i++) {
st1.setLong(1, i);
st1.setDouble(2, i * 0.1);
st1.setLong(3, i * 2);
st1.setString(4, "c3_" + i);
st1.setString(5, "c4_" + i);
st1.setString(6, "c5_" + i);
st1.setString(7, "c6_" + i);
st1.executeUpdate();


st2.setLong(1, i);
st2.setLong(2, i);
st2.setDouble(3, i * 0.2);
st2.setLong(4, i * 3);
st2.setString(5, "c3_" + i);
st2.setString(6, "c4_" + i);
st2.setString(7, "c5_" + i);
st2.setString(8, "c6_" + i);
st2.executeUpdate();


st3.setLong(1, i);
st3.setLong(2, i);
st3.setDouble(3, i * 0.3);
st3.setLong(4, i * 4);
st3.setString(5, "c3_" + i);
st3.setString(6, "c4_" + i);
st3.setString(7, "c5_" + i);
st3.setString(8, "c6_" + i);
st3.executeUpdate();


st4.setLong(1, i);
st4.setLong(2, i);
st4.setDouble(3, i * 0.4);
st4.setLong(4, i * 5);
st4.setString(5, "c3_" + i);
st4.setString(6, "c4_" + i);
st4.setString(7, "c5_" + i);
st4.setString(8, "c6_" + i);
st4.executeUpdate();

} 5.测试结果 4张表，每张插入100万数据，消耗时间对比单位：毫秒 MemSQLSQLFireOracle6247651961401289811 以下为查询测试，均执行10次求得平均消耗时间（不包含首次执行）单位：毫秒查询测试一：单表整型字段比较

select count(*) from t_main where c2>1000;

MemSQLSQLFireOracle2167558 查询测试二：单表like

select count(*) from t_main where c4 like '%c%';

MemSQLSQLFireOracle41875133 查询测试三：多表关联浮点数sum

select sum(m.c1+r1.c1+r2.c1+r3.c1) "rt" from t_main m,t_rel1 r1,t_rel2 r2,t_rel3 r3 where m.rec_id=r1.main_id and m.rec_id=r2.main_id and m.rec_id=r3.main_id;

MemSQLSQLFireOracle1365146402077 查询测试四：多表关联整型sum

select sum(m.c2+r1.c2+r2.c2+r3.c2) "rt" from t_main m,t_rel1 r1,t_rel2 r2,t_rel3 r3 where m.rec_id=r1.main_id and m.rec_id=r2.main_id and m.rec_id=r3.main_id;

MemSQLSQLFireOracle1360102572084 6.总结测试过程中CPU、内存使用均未超过50% 插入性能SQLFire最高，MemSQL其次，Oracle最慢，MemSQL效率约是Oracle的两倍查询性能MemSQL最高，Oracle其次，SQLFire最慢（慢的出奇。

。

），MemSQL效率约是Oracle的两倍不知道怎样的环境能测出30倍性能的提升。

。

相关文章